LEVEL 10, 95 NORTH QUAY, BRISBANE QLD 4000  ·  CRIMINAL & FAMILY LAW  ·  (07) 3709 7610

Archive for category: Family Law

You are here: / Family Law

Property Settlement Basics: The Four-Step Process and Why "She Gets Half" Is a Myth

/in /by

Like its parenting cousin ("the kids are automatically 50/50"), the property myth - "she gets half," or "I keep what's in my name" - survives every attempt to kill it. Neither is the law. Australian property settlement runs on a structured process, usually described in four steps.

Step one: identify the pool

Everything gets on the table: houses, mortgages, savings, vehicles, businesses, shares, cryptocurrency, debts - and superannuation, which people persistently forget despite it often being the second-largest asset. Whose name an asset is in matters far less than people assume; the pool is built from what exists, not from title. This step runs on full and frank disclosure - a duty owed by both parties - and hiding assets is both ineffective (lawyers know where to look) and damaging when found.

Step two: assess contributions

What did each party contribute across the relationship? Financial contributions (income, assets brought in, inheritances) sit alongside non-financial ones - and the law treats homemaking and raising children as genuine contributions, not lesser ones. A parent who spent twelve years running the household while the other earned has contributed, in the law's eyes, to every dollar the earner banked. Length of the relationship, initial assets, and post-separation contributions all feed the assessment.

Step three: future needs

The forward-looking adjustment: age and health of each party, income and earning capacity, who has primary care of children, and the practical effect of the relationship on each person's ability to earn. This is where percentages move - a party with the children, lower earning capacity, or health issues commonly receives an adjustment beyond bare contributions.

Step four: is the result just and equitable?

The court stands back and asks whether the overall outcome is fair in the real world - how it's actually paid out, who keeps the house versus the super, whether the split works in practice.

Why the myths fail

"Half" is sometimes the answer - but as an output of the four steps in a particular case, never a starting rule. And "what's in my name stays mine" fails at step one. Time limits apply too: generally one year from divorce, two from the end of a de facto relationship, so settling promptly protects your rights. Agreements can be formalised by consent orders without ever litigating - most are.

This article is general information about Australian family law, not legal advice. Property settlements turn on their facts - call Aegis Law Group on (07) 3709 7610 for a fixed-fee assessment of your position.

There Is No Automatic 50/50: How Parenting Arrangements Are Really Decided in Australia

/in /by

If there's one belief we correct more than any other at first appointments, it's this one: "the law says it starts at 50/50." It doesn't - and understanding what the law actually says will save you months of arguing toward a starting line that doesn't exist.

What the law actually asks

Australian family law doesn't begin with a formula. It begins with a question: what arrangement is in the best interests of this child? That is the paramount consideration under the Family Law Act, and everything else - including how much time each parent gets - flows from it.

When the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia decides a parenting case, it looks at matters like the safety of the child and each parent, the child's own views (given weight according to their age and maturity), each child's developmental, psychological and emotional needs, the capacity of each parent to meet those needs, the benefit of the child having a relationship with both parents where it's safe, and anything else relevant to the particular child. Nowhere in that list is a presumption that time will be split equally.

Where the 50/50 myth came from

For a period, the legislation contained a presumption of "equal shared parental responsibility" - which was about decision-making, not time - and a requirement to consider equal time in certain circumstances. That framework was widely misunderstood as an entitlement to 50/50, and it has since been reformed. Today the law is simpler and blunter: best interests, assessed on the evidence, child by child.

What arrangements actually look like

Because every family is different, orders vary enormously. Some children genuinely thrive in equal-time arrangements - typically where the parents live near each other, communicate functionally, and the children are of an age where week-about works. Other children spend most time with one parent and substantial or significant time with the other - weekends, part of the school week, half of holidays. Where there are safety concerns, time may be supervised or, in serious cases, not ordered at all.

The practical variables that shape outcomes are usually unglamorous: how far apart the parents live, school logistics, the children's ages, who has been doing the day-to-day care, each parent's work patterns, and - above everything - safety. Family violence and risk change the analysis entirely, and the court treats them with priority.

What this means for your negotiation

Two things follow from the absence of a 50/50 starting point.

First, don't anchor your expectations (or your position in mediation) to a fraction. Proposals framed around your child's actual week - school, sport, sleep, transitions - are more persuasive to the other side, to mediators, and ultimately to a court than proposals framed around percentages.

Second, evidence matters more than assertion. The parent who can show a track record of meeting the children's needs, supporting their relationship with the other parent, and behaving sensibly under pressure is in a far stronger position than the parent with a spreadsheet of nights. (A related tip we give every client: assume every text message you send your former partner will one day be read by a judge. Write accordingly.)

Before court: the mediation step

In most cases, parents must attempt family dispute resolution and obtain a section 60I certificate before filing parenting proceedings - with exceptions, including urgency and family violence. Many matters resolve at or before mediation, and a resolution you shape together generally beats one imposed on both of you.

The short version

There is no automatic anything. The law asks what is best for your child, and answers it on evidence. Build your proposal around your child's real life, keep your conduct exemplary, and get advice early - the first weeks after separation shape the arrangements more than most people realise.

This article is general information about Australian family law, not legal advice about your situation. Parenting matters turn on their own facts - for advice specific to your circumstances, call Aegis Law Group on (07) 3709 7610 for a fixed-fee case assessment. We act in parenting matters across Brisbane and South East Queensland, including Legal Aid Queensland matters.

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.
@aegislawgroup  ·  @nkslawofficial